OK, so I'm feeding my flock and the Jehovah's Witnesses come up with their literature for me. (feeding my flock - get it?! Do I crack you up as much as I do myself?! Sorry, off track again, sigh.)
And, no shit, the cover title says: "PORNOGRAPHY." Whoa, this is not what I expected of this religion!
OK, OK, I am a proponent of faithful marriage/relationships and I am not fond of porn, but the whole thing hit my funny bone just so - so I have to play devil's advocate - you understand.
So, curious I checked it out - all in the name of good investigative reporting, mind you. Here's a sample box in the article (typos are mine, but the weird grammar is all theirs):
They are giving me a choice? I could pick this apart on both sides (and get lots of folks upset with me) but I'll just let you do that for yourselves.
I don't know about you, but I don't think that any of this stuff changed any minds on the subject. Again the worst part is that I'm not a fan of porn. While I'm not knocking the Jehovah's Witnesses, I am making fun of the article that was written.
************
Here, I thought prawnography (click for link) was really bad, not silly... only I guess I didn't know how to spell it before.
That's my opinion and I'm sticking with it.
Recent Comments